Case 1404974/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Miss D Ramon v Achieve Together Limited — 2024

Case reference: 1404974/2023
Decision date: 14 August 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Self Appearances
Venue: Havant

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss D Ramon

Respondent

Achieve Together Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the preliminary hearing on 2 August 2024 at Havant, Employment Judge Self dealt with strike-out and deposit-order applications. The written judgment sent to the parties on 14 August 2024 was confined to those applications and did not determine the merits of any claim that remained live.

The Tribunal struck out the redundancy payment claim, the automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A ERA 1996, and the protected disclosure detriment claim under section 47B ERA because each had no reasonable prospects of success. It also held that the race discrimination allegations and the religious discrimination allegations had little reasonable prospects of success, and ordered deposits of £25 per allegation for those claims.

The applications to strike out or for deposit orders in respect of the holiday pay claim and the unlawful deduction of wages claim were dismissed. Those two claims were therefore not finally decided by this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

7 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	Struck out because the claim had no reasonable prospects of success.	Struck out	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A ERA 1996 struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success.	Struck out	—	—
Whistleblowing	Protected disclosure detriment claim under section 47B ERA struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success.	Struck out	—	—
Race discrimination	Deposit order made: the race discrimination allegations were found to have little reasonable prospects of success, and the claimant was ordered to pay £25 per allegation.	Other	Race	—
Religion or belief discrimination	Deposit order made: the religious discrimination allegations were found to have little reasonable prospects of success, and the claimant was ordered to pay £25 per allegation.	Other	Religion or belief	—
Holiday pay	Application to strike out or for a deposit order was dismissed; the holiday pay claim was not finally determined by this judgment.	Other	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.