Case 1405224/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr C. Johnson (Consultant) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405224/2018
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail
- Venue
- Exeter
- Panel members
- Mrs S. Long, Mrs E. Scadding
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, constituted by Employment Judge Smail with Mrs S. Long and Mrs E. Scadding, recorded that the Claimant’s claims of direct pregnancy discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. The judgment does not set out the full reasons for those findings in the extracted text; it states that written reasons were requested and would be supplied in due course.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay compensation on account of £25,366 within 28 days. It identified that sum as comprising injury to feelings including interest assessed at £20,520 and a basic award of £4,846, both heads being determined at the hearing. The balance of compensation was left to be assessed, unless agreed, at a remedy hearing listed for 28 September 2021 at Exeter Law Courts, and the Claimant was directed to serve an updated Schedule of Loss, witness statement, and supporting documents by 30 July 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records a successful claim of direct pregnancy discrimination. The £20,520 figure is stated as injury to feelings including interest and formed part of the compensation on account ordered by the tribunal. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £20,520 |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records a successful claim of constructive unfair dismissal. The £4,846 figure is stated as a basic award and formed part of the compensation on account ordered by the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £4,846 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,366
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,846
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.