Case 1405257/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Simmons v City Facilities Management (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405257/2018
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Members
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mr H J Launder, Mr H Patel
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Simmons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Bristol before Employment Judge Reed with members Mr H J Launder and Mr H Patel, gave a unanimous judgment. It found that Miss T Simmons was not subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures and that she was not unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract claim and found that City Facilities Management (UK) Limited did not fail to make proper payment for holiday accrued and untaken on termination. The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages relating to November 2017 was postponed, with provision that it would be treated as dismissed on withdrawal if neither party applied to restore it within 28 days.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limits.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claimant was not subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unauthorised deductions from wages relating to November 2017 was postponed, with an order that it would be treated as dismissed on withdrawal if neither party applied to restore it within 28 days. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent did not fail to make proper payment for holiday accrued and untaken on termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.