Case 1405295/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nicholson, SARC v Mr Robson Solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 1405295/2020
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Members
- Panel members
- J Killick, R Spry-Shute
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nicholson, SARC
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Southampton, sitting by VHS on 4, 5, 6 and 7 April 2022 before Employment Judge Street with members J Killick and R Spry-Shute, heard the claimant’s claims against Lowater Limited trading as Lowaters Nursery. The judgment records that the claim of discrimination arising from disability contrary to sections 15 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 succeeded, while the harassment claim was dismissed.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £10,343 in respect of the successful discrimination claim. That sum comprised £9,000 for injury to feelings and £1,343 interest from 29 May 2020 at the statutory rate of 8%. The judgment does not record any separate award for the dismissed harassment claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claim of discrimination arising from disability contrary to sections 15 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £10,343, made up of £9,000 for injury to feelings and £1,343 interest from 29 May 2020 at 8%. | Upheld | Disability | £10,343 |
| Harassment | The harassment claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,343
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.