Case 1405344/2019 · Employment Tribunal
- MS T O’HALLORAN (COUNSEL) FOR THE v Sol Attendance Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405344/2019
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- MS T O’HALLORAN (COUNSEL) FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal declared that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with a requirement of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. It made a protective award in respect of all employees of the respondent employed at its South Newton, Wiltshire site who were dismissed as redundant on or after 13 August 2019.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay those employees remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 30 January 2019. It also entered judgment for the claimants identified in the schedule for unpaid holiday pay, with the relevant sums stated to be in that schedule.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal made a protective award for failure to comply with section 188 of TULRCA. The individual sums were said to be in an attached schedule, but no figures are present in the supplied judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Judgment was entered for unpaid holiday pay for the claimants identified in the attached schedule. The sums were said to be set out in that schedule, but no figures are present in the supplied judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.