Case 1405375/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Doughty For the v Mr Henry (professional representative) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405375/2020
- Decision date
- 24 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lowe Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Doughty For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr P Brace, brought claims against Isle of Wight Distillery Limited. The case was heard at Southampton by Cloud Video Platform on 10 August 2021 before Employment Judge Lowe, with Mr Doughty appearing for the claimant and Mr Henry for the respondent.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal and also upheld the claimant’s claim for breach of contract. The written decision does not set out the detailed factual or legal reasoning for those findings in the extracted text provided.
The judgment records a total award of £6,582.54. It also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The written record does not split the £6,582.54 award between the upheld claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,583
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.