Case 1405488/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter Crates v JD Sports Fashion plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405488/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr P English, Mr L Wakeman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Peter Crates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Southampton on 2 and 3 December 2024 before Employment Judge Self, sitting with Mr P English and Mr L Wakeman. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. It contains no findings on the merits of the claims and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than detailed reasons in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.