Case 1405511/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Allen v Priory Group — 2021
- Case reference
- 1405511/2020
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims of unfair dismissal, deductions from wages and disability discrimination.
The reason given was that, after a letter dated 27 May 2021 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, the claimant failed to give reasons or request a hearing. The letter had identified non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 11 May 2021 and that the claims were not being actively pursued.
The listed Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing on 18 August 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 11 May 2021 and the claims were not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this as a claim for deductions from wages and states that it was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was struck out because the claimant did not give reasons or request a hearing after being given an opportunity to do so. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.