Case 1405548/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Padroni v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405548/2019
- Decision date
- 27 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Padroni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 27 May 2020, Ms S Padroni withdrew her complaints of harassment on grounds of disability, discrimination arising from disability, harassment on grounds of race, direct discrimination on grounds of race, and victimisation. The tribunal recorded those complaints as dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment does not determine the merits of those complaints and records no remedy, because the claims were withdrawn before any substantive findings were made. It also states that the claimant's other complaints continued. Written reasons were not provided, because reasons were given orally and no request for written reasons is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Withdrawn orally at the hearing on 27 May 2020 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of discrimination arising from a disability was withdrawn orally at the hearing on 27 May 2020 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Withdrawn orally at the hearing on 27 May 2020 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The complaint of direct discrimination on grounds of race was withdrawn orally at the hearing on 27 May 2020 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Withdrawn orally at the hearing on 27 May 2020 and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.