Case 1405817/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Yowaa v University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1405817/2019
- Decision date
- 8 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Yowaa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records claims by Mr R Yowaa against University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust under case numbers 1405817/2019 and 1400821/2020. It is a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52.
The tribunal stated that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims. The judgment does not set out findings of fact, legal reasoning, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims; it does not give separate reasons or claim particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims; the race classification comes from the supplied listing category and the judgment itself gives no further particulars. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims; it does not give separate reasons or claim particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.