Case 1405866/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Beech v Slicks Sports & Bars Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1405866/2020
- Decision date
- 11 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray And
- Panel members
- R Goddard, MJ Cronin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Beech
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case by video on 27 to 30 June 2022 and gave a unanimous liability-only judgment. It found that the first, second and fourth allegations of discrimination under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 succeeded, while the third, fifth and sixth allegations failed and were dismissed.
The judgment also records that the complaints of harassment for pregnancy and maternity were not pursued. The tribunal said those complaints were outside the statutory definition and dismissed them.
On the wages issue, the tribunal found that the claimant had proven that furlough pay from 6 July 2020 to the start of her maternity period, which she said would be 30 November 2020, and maternity pay for the period she took as maternity leave were properly payable to her and had been deducted without authorisation. The decision does not record any remedy figure because it is a liability judgment only.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal recorded six allegations under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010. The first, second and fourth allegations succeeded, while the third, fifth and sixth failed and were dismissed. The liability judgment does not split any award by allegation and no remedy is recorded. | Other | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Harassment | The complaints of harassment for pregnancy and maternity were not pursued, the tribunal said they were outside the statutory definition, and they were dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant proved that furlough pay from 6 July 2020 to the start of her maternity period, which she said would be 30 November 2020, and maternity pay for the period she took as maternity leave were properly payable and had been deducted without authorisation. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.