Case 1406095/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Lowe v UK Tv Ltd and 4 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406095/2020
- Decision date
- 22 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Mr J Lowe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short procedural order. It records that the claims made under case number 1406095/2020 against David Montgomery, Alison Twibell and Jordan Mann were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. It also records that the Claimant's harassment claim, said in the judgment to be contrary to section 26 Equality Act 2021, was dismissed against all respondents on withdrawal by the Claimant.
The tribunal then stated that the Claimant's remaining claims against the two remaining respondents, UK TV Ltd and Leslie Mackenzie, would continue as listed. The judgment does not determine the merits of those remaining claims and contains no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type or substantive allegations. It records that the claims made under case number 1406095/2020 against David Montgomery, Alison Twibell and Jordan Mann were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records a claim of harassment contrary to section 26 Equality Act 2021, which was dismissed against all respondents on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.