Case 1406596/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms J Helling, Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 1406596/2020
- Decision date
- 17 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing held in chambers at Plymouth on 7 September 2021 before Employment Judge N J Roper, the tribunal recorded that Mrs Alison Peverill's claims for harassment on the grounds of race, detriment for having made protected public interest disclosures, and accrued but unpaid holiday pay were all dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment stated that this did not affect the claimant's remaining claims, which were to continue as explained in the case management summary referred to in the order. This decision did not contain any findings on liability, did not apply a substantive merits test, and made no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment records that the harassment claim on the grounds of race was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; no merits finding was made. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the detriment claim for having made protected public interest disclosures was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; no merits finding was made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the accrued but unpaid holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; no merits finding was made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.