Case 1406681/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Holding v Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1406681/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Holding
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol on 10, 11 and 12 January 2022 before Employment Judge Livesey. The claimant, Mrs F Holding, appeared in person and the respondent, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant brought complaints of dismissal and detriment on the grounds that she had made public interest disclosures under ss. 47B and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal dismissed both complaints. The written record does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or legal reasoning, and it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissal complaint under s.103A ERA 1996 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment complaint under s.47B ERA 1996 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.