Case 1600072/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S. Griffiths v Rhi-Styles Ltd HELD BY: CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600072/2019
- Decision date
- 31 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
- Panel members
- Ms H. Mason, Ms L. Thomas
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S. Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant withdrew her age discrimination and victimisation complaints, and the tribunal dismissed both upon that withdrawal. It also recorded that there had been no claim alleging a failure to provide itemised statements.
The claimant confirmed that she made no claim under Regulation 7 of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000. The tribunal found her Regulation 5 complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. Her constructive unfair dismissal complaint also failed: the judgment records that she resigned from her employment on 31 October 2018 and that the claim was dismissed.
Separately, the tribunal recorded that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. However, in light of the outcome of the case, it held that she was not entitled to an award under that heading, so no monetary remedy was made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claimant withdrew the age discrimination complaint and the tribunal dismissed it upon that withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Victimisation | The claimant withdrew the victimisation complaint and the tribunal dismissed it upon that withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Part-time worker regulations | The claimant confirmed that she made no claim under Regulation 7 of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000; the Regulation 5 complaint was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant resigned on 31 October 2018 and her claim that she had been constructively unfairly dismissed failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal recorded that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars, but said that in light of the above judgment the claimant was not entitled to an award. Mapped to 'other' because the taxonomy has no dedicated category for this statutory claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.