Case 1600081/2023 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Mr Jones (consultant) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600081/2023
- Decision date
- 3 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Povey, sitting remotely on 30 June 2023, held that the Claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was made out and succeeded. The judgment records a monetary award of £2,324.67, made up of £1,814.82 for loss of earnings, £59.85 for pension contributions, and £450.00 for loss of statutory rights.
The judgment also records that the Respondent had paid a statutory redundancy payment of £2,137.50 on 15 December 2022, but tax and National Insurance deductions of £477.64 were made at source and the Claimant would seek repayment of those sums from HMRC. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 were stated not to apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only a single monetary award of £2,324.67 for this successful unfair dismissal claim, itemised as loss of earnings, pension contributions, and loss of statutory rights. It does not separately label a basic award or compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £2,325 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,325
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,325
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.