Case 1600132/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S. Ibrahim v The Chief Constable of Gwent Police — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600132/2022
- Decision date
- 2 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S. Ibrahim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Wrexham by CVP on 29 July 2022, Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan recorded the tribunal's judgment that the claimant's claims of direct disability discrimination and victimisation were dismissed upon being withdrawn by the claimant. The written record states that the withdrawal did not affect her other claims presented to the tribunal.
The judgment does not contain findings on the merits of either claim and records no monetary award. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the direct disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon being withdrawn by the claimant. No merits findings were recorded. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the victimisation claim was dismissed upon being withdrawn by the claimant. No merits findings were recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.