Case 1600149/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Price v Engie FM Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600149/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Price
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting alone, struck out Ms A Price's claim against Engie Fm Ltd and Schneider Electric Ltd. The judgment records that by letter dated 20 January 2022 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 16 November 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Moore ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no substantive findings on the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 20 January 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 16 November 2021 and because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.