Case 1600174/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Griffiths v Boots Opticians Professional Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600174/2021
- Decision date
- 9 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Griffiths
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr N Griffiths was continuously employed by Boots Opticians Professional Services Limited from 4 January 2016 to 16 November 2020, and therefore had sufficient continuity of employment to bring an unfair dismissal claim under sections 92 to 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On the merits of the claim, the tribunal held that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. The reasons text supplied for the judgment does not set out any further findings, legal analysis, or remedy because no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant had sufficient continuity of employment to present an unfair dismissal claim under sections 92 to 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but the tribunal found that he was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 92 to 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.