Case 1600288/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Glenn Leigh v Matrix Workplace Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600288/2024
- Decision date
- 7 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Webb Representation
- Venue
- ET Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Glenn Leigh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Glenn Leigh brought claims against Matrix Workplace Services Limited, including unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, indirect discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment. The judgment was heard at ET Cardiff on 1 November 2024 before Employment Judge N Webb, with reasons given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal held that Mr Leigh did not have two years' service with the respondent. On that basis it found it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal and redundancy payment claims, and those claims were dismissed.
The tribunal also recorded that the indirect discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment claims had been presented out of time. It found it was just and equitable to extend time for presenting those claims, so the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear them. The short judgment does not determine the substantive merits of those claims and records no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant did not have two years' service with the respondent, so it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant did not have two years' service with the respondent, so it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination claim. It was presented out of time, but the tribunal extended time and held that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claim. It was presented out of time, but the tribunal extended time and held that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim. It was presented out of time, but the tribunal extended time and held that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.