Case 1600299/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Driscoll v Cavali Investments Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600299/2021
- Decision date
- 14 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Driscoll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter by video on 10 February 2022 with neither party attending. It recorded that the claimant had indicated an intention to withdraw the claims, and it stayed the linked proceedings in cases 1600299/2021 and 1600418/2021 until 10 March 2022. The tribunal also reconsidered and revoked the judgment of 31 August 2021.
If the claimant did not write to the tribunal before 10 March 2022 saying that she wished the proceedings to continue, the claims in both cases would be dismissed upon withdrawal. The tribunal added that, if there was no further contact before that date, the proceedings would be automatically struck out without any further order or application. No merits findings or monetary award were recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Procedural order covering the linked proceedings in cases 1600299/2021 and 1600418/2021. The tribunal stayed the proceedings until 10 March 2022 after the claimant indicated an intention to withdraw, revoked the judgment of 31 August 2021, and said the claims would be dismissed upon withdrawal, with automatic strike out if there was no further contact from the claimant by that date. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.