Case 1600401/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Jones v Powys County Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600401/2021
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ward JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the claimant's application to extend time for a complaint of harassment related to sexual orientation. The judgment recorded that the last act complained of was 30 October 2020, ACAS conciliation ran from 26 February 2021 to 1 March 2021, and the claim form was submitted on 26 March 2021. The claim was out of time because ACAS conciliation should have commenced by 29 January 2021.
Employment Judge Ward heard evidence from the claimant and from Mr Davis and Mrs Hughes of the respondent's HR department. The claimant relied on the impact of the alleged treatment on his mental health and his assumption that there was an ongoing investigation by the respondent. The tribunal found that the claimant was clearly unwell after 30 October 2020, that this initially affected his ability to work, and that obtaining other employment did not mean he was capable of applying to the tribunal.
The tribunal applied the just and equitable discretion under s123 of the Equality Act 2010, balancing the claimant being unable to pursue his claim against prejudice to the respondent from witnesses' difficulty recalling events. It found that the HR interaction had no real bearing on the claimant's decision-making abilities, but concluded that it was just and equitable to extend time. The extension of time was granted and the claim was permitted to proceed; no remedy or merits determination was recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment granted an extension of time under s123 Equality Act 2010 and permitted the harassment-related-to-sexual-orientation claim to proceed; it did not determine the merits of the harassment complaint. | Other | Sexual orientation | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.