Case 1600406/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Morgan v Excel Precision Engineering Supplies Limited Heard: Cardiff (by video) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600406/2022
- Decision date
- 22 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Morgan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Morgan brought claims against Excel Precision Engineering Supplies Limited, heard by Employment Judge S Jenkins at Cardiff by video on 21 November 2022. The judgment deals only with time limits and does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the claims.
The tribunal dismissed Mr Morgan's unfair dismissal claim and his claim of detriment related to leave for family and domestic reasons because they were not brought within the relevant three-month period. The tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable for those claims to have been brought within time.
Mr Morgan's claim of harassment related to sex was also dismissed. The tribunal found that it was not brought within three months of the alleged act and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as out of time; the tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought within the relevant three-month period beginning with the effective date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim described as detriment related to leave for family and domestic reasons. Dismissed as out of time; the tribunal found it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought within the relevant three-month period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Claim described as harassment related to sex. Dismissed as out of time because it was not brought within three months of the act complained of and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.