Case 1600421/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Wendolowski v DHL E-Commerce UK Ltd and 2 others — 2026
- Case reference
- 1600421/2025
- Decision date
- 14 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr P Wendolowski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing in Cardiff on 14 April 2026, Employment Judge S Moore dismissed Mr P Wendolowski's complaints of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages, breach of contract and unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal found that these complaints had been presented outside the applicable time limits and that it had been reasonably practicable to present them in time.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaints of direct race discrimination and race-related harassment because they had been presented outside the applicable time limit. It found that extending time was not just and equitable. Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented outside the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that presentation in time was reasonably practicable. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Presented outside the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that presentation in time was reasonably practicable. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Presented outside the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that presentation in time was reasonably practicable. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Presented outside the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that presentation in time was reasonably practicable. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination complaint presented outside the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that extending time was not just and equitable. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Race-related harassment complaint presented outside the applicable time limit. The tribunal found that extending time was not just and equitable. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Whether presentation within the applicable time limit was reasonably practicable
- Whether extending the time limit was just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.