Case 1600454/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andi Beqiraj v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2025
- Case reference
- 1600454/2024
- Decision date
- 12 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Ms M Farley, Ms S Hurds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andi Beqiraj
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Cardiff on 4, 5 and 6 August 2025 before Employment Judge S Jenkins, Ms M Farley and Ms S Hurds. The claimant was represented by counsel, as was the respondent.
The judgment records that the claimant's complaints of direct race discrimination and harassment related to race failed and were dismissed. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated period.
No remedy or monetary award was made in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct race discrimination failed and was dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the supplied judgment because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the complaint of harassment related to race failed and was dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the supplied judgment because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.