Case 1600521/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Williams v Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600521/2022
- Decision date
- 15 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 July 2022, the tribunal gave Mr M Williams an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out for insufficient service. He did not make any written representations within the time allowed.
The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The reasons state only that the dismissal claim was struck out on that procedural basis and that the claimant's remaining claims remained live. No remedy was assessed or awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 7 July 2022 to make representations or request a hearing on insufficient service. The claimant did not make written representations. The reasons note that the remaining claims remained live. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.