Case 1600535/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Richards v The Four Winds Bar and Restaurant Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600535/2020
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Richards
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent had not presented an ET3 response. The judgment states that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to enable a proper determination to be made in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal upheld two claims identified in the judgment as unpaid wages and notice pay. It awarded Mr P Richards £790.50 for unpaid wages and £738.90 for notice pay, making a total award of £1,529.40.
The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. No separate award for holiday pay, interest, or any other remedy is set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £791 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this award as 'Notice Pay'. It does not separately label the legal cause of action beyond the Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | £739 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,529
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.