Case 1600538/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Dicks v The Four Winds Bar and Restaurant Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600538/2020
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Dicks
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Brace recorded that the respondent had not presented an ET3 response form and that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination. Acting under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the tribunal upheld the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice pay.
The tribunal awarded Miss E Dicks £82.10 for unpaid wages, £796.37 for holiday pay and £476.18 for notice pay, producing a total award of £1,354.65. The judgment stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment described this as unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £82 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £796 |
| Breach of contract | The Rule 21 judgment described this as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £476 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,355
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.