Case 1600539/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Stephens v The Four Winds Bar and Restaurant Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600539/2020
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Stephens
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent had not presented an ET3 response and there was sufficient material before the judge to determine the matter. Employment Judge Brace upheld the claims identified in the judgment as unpaid wages and notice pay.
For unpaid wages, the tribunal awarded £273.98. For notice pay, the tribunal awarded £230.72. The total award was £504.70. The judgment also recorded that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this claim as 'Unpaid Wages' and awards £273.98 under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £274 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this claim as 'Notice Pay' and awards £230.72. It does not use the label 'wrongful dismissal'. | Upheld | — | £231 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £505
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.