Case 1600541/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M O’Callaghan v The Four Winds Bar and Restaurant Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600541/2020
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M O’Callaghan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent had not presented an ET3 response form and there was sufficient material before the Employment Judge to make a proper determination.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, missing wages, holiday pay and notice pay. It awarded £176.51 for unpaid wages, £271.15 for missing wages, £98.52 for holiday pay and £1,182.24 for notice pay, making a total award of £1,728.42.
The judgment recorded that the claimant was responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment upheld wage claims labelled 'Unpaid Wages' (£176.51) and 'Missing Wages' (£271.15). | Upheld | — | £448 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £99 |
| Breach of contract | The award was labelled 'Notice Pay' in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,182 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,728
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.