Case 1600558/2018 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Mr Clarke (litigation Consultant) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600558/2018
- Decision date
- 17 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mrs Fines, Ms Southall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Mold on 8 August 2019, Employment Judge W Beard sitting with lay members Mrs Fines and Ms Southall unanimously found that Miss S Fletcher’s claim of sex discrimination under section 18 Equality Act 2010, based on maternity, was well founded. The tribunal also unanimously found her claim of unfair dismissal under section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well founded.
The judgment then set out a discrimination compensation award of £3,927.05 against Chesterton Care Home Limited. That award comprised £920 for loss of earnings, £187.50 for one week’s notice pay at 25 hours x £7.50 per hour, £2,500 for injury to feelings, and £319.55 interest calculated at 8% per annum over 581 days.
The extracted text records the formal findings and the remedy calculation, but it does not give further factual reasoning beyond the tribunal’s conclusions on the two claims. No separate monetary award is stated for the unfair dismissal finding in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant’s sex discrimination claim under section 18 Equality Act 2010, based on maternity, was well founded. The judgment ordered £3,927.05 in compensation for discrimination, made up of loss of earnings, notice pay, injury to feelings and interest. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £3,927 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim under section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded. No separate monetary award for this claim is set out in the extracted judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,927
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,108
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.18 Equality Act 2010
- s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.