Case 1600642/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Stacey S Navaei/Cooke v Poundland Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600642/2019
- Decision date
- 20 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Stacey S Navaei/Cooke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that no ET3 response form had been received from the respondent. Employment Judge Harfield found there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination and upheld the claimant's unfair dismissal claim.
The judgment was limited to liability only. Remedy, and the claimant's other outstanding complaints about arrears of pay, holiday pay, failure to provide an itemized pay slip, and failure to provide particulars of employment, were left to be dealt with at a later remedy hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability only judgment under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response form; remedy was reserved for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.