Case 1600671/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Roberts v Plas Garnedd Llanberis Ltd. — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600671/2019
- Decision date
- 11 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RL Brace
- Venue
- Mold
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, Employment Judge RL Brace adjourned the hearing on 9 September 2019 to allow the parties to implement agreed terms of settlement. The judgment records that either party could apply to restore the case for further hearing if the settlement was not carried out.
The order further stated that if no application to restore was received by 4pm on Monday 7 October 2019, the claim would stand dismissed. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of the breach of contract or unfair dismissal claims, nor any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The hearing was adjourned by consent to allow implementation of the agreed terms of settlement. The judgment stated that the claim would stand dismissed if no application to restore was received by 4pm on 7 October 2019. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The hearing was adjourned by consent to allow implementation of the agreed terms of settlement. The judgment stated that the claim would stand dismissed if no application to restore was received by 4pm on 7 October 2019. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.