Case 1600757/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Angel v Lex Machinery Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600757/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Angel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Angel’s claims against Lex Machinery Limited were dismissed at Cardiff Employment Tribunal on 25 November 2022 because neither party attended the hearing. The tribunal recorded that it could not make a decision in the absence of the claimant because he had failed to provide any evidence to substantiate the claims.
The judgment states that the claims were dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (as amended). No findings were made on the substantive merits of the claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (as amended) because the claimant did not attend and provided no evidence to substantiate the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (as amended) because the claimant did not attend and provided no evidence to substantiate the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (as amended)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.