Case 1600810/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss EF v The Chief Constable of Gwent Police — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600810/2021
- Decision date
- 23 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mrs J Beard, Mrs J Kiely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss EF
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a single claim: the claimant's victimisation claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. That claim failed and was dismissed. No separate findings, liability analysis, or remedy award are set out in the written record provided.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of service of the written record. The extracted text does not include the oral reasons themselves, so no further substantive reasoning can be recorded from this source.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Claim brought pursuant to section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.