Case 1600813/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Roberts v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600813/2021
- Decision date
- 10 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Panel members
- Ms C Peel, Mr M Pearson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously dismissed the Claimant's claims for discrimination arising out of disability and harassment relating to disability.
The judgment records that the claims were not well-founded because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction. The reason given was that the Claimant was not disabled at the relevant time. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim described as discrimination arising out of disability. It was dismissed as not well-founded because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction as the Claimant was not disabled at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim described as harassment relating to disability. It was dismissed as not well-founded because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction as the Claimant was not disabled at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.