Case 1600824/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Davis v Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600824/2017
- Decision date
- 3 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mr M Pearson, Mr A Fryer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Davis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was a long-serving radiographer who was dismissed with notice for ill-health capability after long periods of sickness absence. The respondent accepted that she was disabled by reason of mental impairment. The tribunal found that workplace relationships on the emergency radiology night shift had broken down, but preferred the respondent's witnesses where there were material factual disputes and found that many of the claimant's allegations about colleagues were not established.
The tribunal found that none of the five alleged disclosures about an elderly femur x-ray patient and a tuck shop amounted to protected disclosures. It found that the claimant did not have the required reasonable belief that the disclosures were in the public interest or tended to show a relevant failure. The whistleblowing detriment and automatic unfair dismissal complaints were therefore dismissed.
The disability discrimination complaints were also dismissed. The tribunal found no sufficient link between the alleged harassment and disability, rejected most alleged failures to make reasonable adjustments, and found that the respondent had taken or would have considered relevant support steps in the circumstances. The discrimination arising from disability complaint about dismissal was dismissed because, although dismissal was unfavourable treatment arising from disability-related absence, the tribunal found it was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
The ordinary unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the tribunal found the reason for dismissal was capability, the respondent had obtained occupational health evidence and consulted the claimant, and there was no realistic prospect of return or redeployment. The unlawful deduction claim was dismissed because the alleged sum was not properly quantified and, in any event, the tribunal found the claimant did not meet the eligibility criteria for injury allowance and the refusal was not Wednesbury unreasonable.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Disability-related harassment under section 26 Equality Act 2010 dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure detriment under section 47B ERA and automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A ERA dismissed; the tribunal found no protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Ordinary unfair dismissal under section 98 ERA dismissed; the tribunal found dismissal for ill-health capability was fair. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages claim concerning enhanced hours payments and/or injury allowance dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
30 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.47B ERA 1996
- s.20 Equality Act 2010
- s.21 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- BS v Dundee City Council
- Spencer v Paragon Wallpapers Ltd
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Blackbay Ventures Ltd (t/a Chemistree) v Gahir
- Babula v Waltham Forest College
- Korashi v Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board
- Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
- Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal
- Reverend Canon Pemberton v Right Reverend Inwood
- Trustees of Swansea University Pension & Assurance Scheme v Williams
- Pnaiser v NHS England
- Ladele v London Borough of Islington
- O'Brien v Bolton St Catherine's Academy
- Environment Agency v Rowan
- Sheikholeslami v The University of Edinburgh
- Burke v College of Law
- Doran v Department of Work & Pensions
- Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v Foster
- Hereford and Worcestershire County Council v Neale
- Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v Mylott
- Agarwal v Cardiff University,同事在句子中替换为 colleagues。 Coors Brewers Ltd v Adcock and Braganza v BP Shipping Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.