Case 1601037/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Leon Schliker v Accomplish Group — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601037/2021
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Leon Schliker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 24 February 2022, Employment Judge Howden-Evans held that Mr Schliker’s disability discrimination claim and wrongful dismissal claim were presented within time and that the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear both claims. The agreed dismissal date was 27 January 2021, ACAS early conciliation began on 10 July 2021, and the ET1 was presented on 28 July 2021.
For the wrongful dismissal claim, the tribunal accepted Mr Schliker’s evidence that in February 2021 he was unaware of the employment tribunal, was experiencing low mood and felt overwhelmed, and had contacted ACAS only briefly before asking his mother to act for him. It found that his reasonable lack of knowledge of the tribunal was the substantial cause of the delay and that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim by 26 April 2021. The tribunal also found that he acted within a reasonable period once he learned of the tribunal in July 2021.
For the disability discrimination claim, the tribunal applied the just and equitable extension test in British Coal Corpn v Keeble and considered the length and reasons for the delay, the effect on evidence, disclosure delays, and the promptness of Mr Schliker’s actions once he knew of the relevant facts. It accepted that documents received on 2 July 2021 gave rise to a belief that the dismissal may have been predetermined and discriminatory, and it held that the claim was presented within such period as was just and equitable. The hearing did not determine the merits of either claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held the disability discrimination claim was presented within time and that it had jurisdiction to hear it under the just and equitable extension. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held the wrongful dismissal claim was presented within time and that it had jurisdiction to hear it under the not reasonably practicable exception. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- not reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
- British Coal Corpn v Keeble [1997] IRLR 336
- s123 Equality Act 2010
- s33 Limitation Act 1980
- Article 7 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd [1974] 1 All ER 520
- Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy UKEAT/0277/18/LA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.