Case 1601046/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gabriel v Town & County Electrical Contractors Limited Heard: by video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601046/2020
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Panel members
- Mrs W Morgan, Mr C Stephenson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gabriel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by video on 9 and 10 August 2021 before Employment Judge S Jenkins sitting with Mrs W Morgan and Mr C Stephenson. The written judgment records that the Claimant, Mr M Gabriel, brought claims of direct discrimination on the ground of disability, discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability, and breach of contract.
The tribunal’s order states that all of those claims failed and were dismissed. The published record contains the dispositive judgment only and notes that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons not provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination on the ground of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.