Case 1601109/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Proctor v Warwick Estates Property Management Ltd and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601109/2019
- Decision date
- 5 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
- Panel members
- Mr M Lewis, Ms H Mason
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Proctor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place by video on 26 October 2020 before Employment Judge S Moore, with lay members Mr M Lewis and Ms H Mason. Mr Proctor was represented by Ms Millin, Counsel, and the respondents were represented by Ms H Cotton, HR Manager. The written record says reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The written judgment records only one substantive finding: that Mr Proctor is a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. No claim-specific outcomes or remedy figures are set out in the supplied written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record only states that the claimant is a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010. It does not set out the substantive claim outcome or any remedy. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.