Case 1601119/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T. Curnock v Bridgend County Borough Council and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601119/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms T. Curnock
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis written record is a short procedural judgment dated 22 October 2020. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims of less favourable treatment under the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 were dismissed because the claimant had withdrawn them. No monetary remedy was awarded in relation to those claims.
The judgment also records that the first respondent, Bridgend County Borough Council, was dismissed from the proceedings by consent, and that the Governing Body of Maesteg Comprehensive School remained as the respondent. The record states that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was not affected by this judgment and was still being pursued. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-term employee regulations | The tribunal recorded these less favourable treatment claims under the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 as dismissed because they had been withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.