Case 1601148/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Williams v Conwy County Borough Council and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601148/2022
- Decision date
- 31 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies Representation
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Mr A Williams, worked at Ysgol Nant y Groes from April 2017 on a series of temporary contracts and later, from September 2021, in the school's ASD unit. The main factual dispute was whether that later arrangement was a fixed-term teaching post or a day-to-day supply engagement. The tribunal accepted the Respondents' evidence about local authority supply arrangements, relied on the pay slips and the absence of formal contractual documentation, and found that the Claimant was engaged as a supply teacher from September 2021.
The tribunal also found that the ASD post was advertised in January 2022 and that the Claimant was unsuccessful at interview. It accepted Mr Huw Jones's evidence that the permanent post was filled and that the successful candidate would start at the beginning of the summer term. On that basis, the tribunal found that the Claimant was told on 2 February 2022 that his temporary role would end at the end of term on 8 April 2022; alternatively, if he was only told later in March, there was still a termination of employment. Applying section 98 ERA 1996 and section 98(4), it held that the reason for dismissal was that the temporary post had been filled, which it treated as some other substantial reason, and the dismissal was fair.
The wrongful dismissal claim also failed. The tribunal held that the Claimant's status from September 2021 was that of a supply teacher on a day-to-day basis and that there was no definite end date for that arrangement because it depended on recruitment to the permanent post. It therefore found that the Burgundy Book notice provisions relied on by the Claimant did not apply. The tribunal dismissed both claims and stated that no remedy hearing was required, though it noted that an application for costs might be made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the Claimant was employed on a supply basis from September 2021 and that his temporary ASD role ended when the permanent post was filled. It found he was told on 2 February 2022 that his employment would end at the end of term on 8 April 2022, and in any event the dismissal was fair under section 98(4) ERA 1996 as some other substantial reason. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found that from September 2021 the Claimant was employed as a supply teacher on a day-to-day basis, so the Burgundy Book notice provisions did not apply. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.95(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Tansell v Henley College Coventry [2013] IRLR 174
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.