Case 1601185/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Graham-Liron v Tacky Cardi Cyf t/a The Dolacouthi Arms and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601185/2018
- Decision date
- 8 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bromige
- Venue
- Wales ET
- Panel members
- Mrs J Beard, Mrs A Burge
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms J Graham-Liron
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in Wales on 7 February 2023 before Employment Judge J Bromige, with lay members Mrs J Beard and Mrs A Burge. The Claimant was represented by a trade union official. The First Respondent did not attend and the Second Respondent appeared in person.
The only substantive finding recorded in the written judgment was that the Second Respondent did not subject the Claimant to unwanted conduct. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim brought under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The tribunal found that the Second Respondent did not subject the Claimant to unwanted conduct and dismissed the claim under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.