Case 1601300/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Malone v Cardiff Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 1601300/2024
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd-Lawrie
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mrs J Keene, Mr A Fryer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Malone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Cardiff on 20-24 January 2025 before Employment Judge Lloyd-Lawrie, Mrs J Keene and Mr A Fryer. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims of direct disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment related to disability all failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses claims of direct disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment dismisses claims of harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.