Case 1601307/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Robert Amner v Hywel Dda University Local Health Board — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601307/2022
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Robert Amner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment record for Robert Amner v Hywel Dda University Local Health Board states that the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded. It also records, in the tribunal's dispositive wording, that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant.
The extract shows that the hearing took place in Cardiff via video on 11 and 12 April, and 4 and 5 May 2023, before Employment Judge Howden-Evans. No lay members are listed in the record provided.
The decision text supplied does not include written reasons or any monetary remedy. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No award figures are recorded in the extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded and that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant. No separate remedy figure is stated in the extracted record. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.