Case 1601395/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Butler v Twenty-Four Seven Recruitment Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601395/2019
- Decision date
- 14 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Butler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cardiff on 7 May 2020, Employment Judge Howden-Evans held that Mr L Butler had insufficient service to bring an unfair dismissal claim under section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The judgment expressly recorded that the dismissal of the unfair dismissal claim left the claimant's claim for lack of notice or notice pay and his race discrimination claim to be determined by the tribunal. No remedy was dealt with in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant had insufficient service to present an unfair dismissal claim under s.108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment said the notice pay and race discrimination claims remained to be determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.