Case 1601484/2021 · Employment Tribunal
D v R1 and others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601484/2021
- Decision date
- 2 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mrs J Beard, Mrs M Walters
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Cardiff in November 2023, gave a reserved remedy judgment after the Respondents' responses had earlier been struck out by Judge Ryan on 11 October 2023. Liability had been determined orally on 9 November 2023 and the panel reconvened in chambers on 29 November 2023 to decide remedy. Anonymisation and restricted reporting orders were made in respect of the Claimant, the Respondents and two further individuals referred to as Person A and Person B.
The Tribunal upheld complaints of automatic unfair dismissal under s.103A ERA 1996, detriments for making protected disclosures (s.47B ERA 1996) and victimisation (s.27 EQA 2010), and four heads of harassment under s.26 EQA 2010 relating to sex (including sexual harassment), sexual orientation, race, gender reassignment and disability. The Tribunal found that the Respondents had 'constructed a false reason to dismiss the Claimant' and described the manner of the dismissal as 'a particularly brutal and spiteful act of victimisation', supporting an award of £5,000 in aggravated damages. A separate award was made under s.38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of particulars.
On remedy the Tribunal awarded injury to feelings totalling £29,000 (split £3,000 for PID detriments, £15,000 for harassment heads, and £11,000 for victimisation), pecuniary loss of £5,794.68 (incorporating a 25% ACAS uplift under s.207A TULRCA 1992 for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code), £5,000 aggravated damages, £500 loss of statutory rights, a £228.96 basic award, £457.92 for the s.38 failure, and interest calculated on each head separately because different Respondents were liable. A grossing-up figure of £2,448.67 was added to reflect tax on the portion above £30,000.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | PID detriments under s.47B ERA 1996 (paragraphs 9(a)-(c)): removal from management WhatsApp group, request to return keys, accusation of theft. R1-R4 jointly and severally liable for £3,000 injury to feelings plus £589.80 interest. | Upheld | — | £3,590 |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal contrary to s.103A ERA 1996. R1 ordered to pay basic award £228.96 and loss of statutory rights £500.00. Compensatory loss for the dismissal itself is captured under the victimisation/PID detriment claim (paragraph 9(d)). | Upheld | — | £729 |
| Victimisation | Victimisation detriment under s.27 EQA 2010 / PID detriment for the dismissal itself (paragraph 9(d)). R1-R4 jointly and severally liable. Pecuniary loss £5,794.68 + interest £598.20 + injury to feelings £11,000 + aggravated damages £5,000 + interest £3,131.62. Tribunal found the manner of dismissal a 'particularly brutal and spiteful act of victimisation'. | Upheld | — | £25,525 |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sexual orientation under s.26 EQA 2010. R1 and R5 jointly and severally liable for £1,500 injury to feelings plus £309.70 interest. The injury to feelings figure for harassment as a category (£15,000 in the breakdown) is split across the four harassment heads in the judgment. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | £1,810 |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race / national origin under s.26 EQA 2010. The judgment awards a single £1,500 + £309.70 interest figure jointly for the sexual orientation and race head (paragraph 3 of the judgment), so the race component is not separately quantified. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £47,247
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £229
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,295
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.124(2)(b) Equality Act 2010
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
- s.401 Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003
- Vento bands
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.