Case 1601499/2022 · Employment Tribunal
- MR E EADE (CAB) FOR THE v - No Appearance — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601499/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- MR E EADE (CAB) FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cardiff on 15 May 2023 by Employment Judge Mr P Cadney sitting alone. The respondent, Fresh and Grilled Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation), did not appear. The tribunal entered judgment for the claimant on all three claims before it: unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and unpaid holiday pay.
The unfair dismissal claim was found well founded and upheld. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £456 and a compensatory award for lost earnings of £694.
The tribunal also held that the wrongful dismissal claim, described in the judgment as notice pay, was well founded and upheld, with £456 awarded. The claim for unpaid holiday pay was likewise well founded and upheld, with £3,192 awarded. The total award recorded by the tribunal was £4,798, and the judgment was entered into the register on 18 May 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award of £456 and a compensatory award for lost earnings of £694. | Upheld | — | £1,150 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as wrongful dismissal (notice pay). | Upheld | — | £456 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to this as unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £3,192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,798
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £456
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £694
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.