Case 1601592/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kevin Mitchell v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601592/2021
- Decision date
- 21 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Sutton Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kevin Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was summarily dismissed after four bottles of vodka were found in his workplace locker. The tribunal accepted that the respondent genuinely believed the claimant was guilty of misconduct, namely wilful concealment of the bottles with intent to steal, and found that belief was based on reasonable grounds.
The tribunal considered criticisms of the investigation, including CCTV evidence, the failure to interview Mr Bevan, and evidence from anonymous or later-identified witnesses. It found that some steps may have been preferable, but the investigation as a whole was reasonable and the decision-maker did not rely on the challenged evidence in a way that made the dismissal unfair.
The tribunal found the respondent acted procedurally fairly, followed its disciplinary process, and that dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses, despite the claimant's long unblemished service. For wrongful dismissal, it found on the balance of probabilities that the claimant had wilfully concealed the vodka with intent to steal, amounting to gross misconduct, so the respondent was entitled to dismiss without notice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claim for wrongful dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- British Home Stores v Burchell
- Iceland Frozen Food v Jones
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- range of reasonable responses
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt
- Trusthouse Forte (Catering) Ltd v Adonis
- A v B
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan
- Linfood Cash and Carry Ltd v Thomson
- Rajendra Shreshtha v Genesis Housing Association Limited
- Hutton v Ras Steam Shipping Co Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.