Case 1601626/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Dr R Djebarni v University of South Wales and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601626/2018
- Decision date
- 23 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RL Brace
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Ms M Walters, Ms M Humphries
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Dr R Djebarni
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cardiff on 16, 17 and 18 September 2019, Employment Judge RL Brace sat with lay members Ms M Walters and Ms M Humphries. By consent, the tribunal adjourned the hearing to allow the parties to implement the agreed terms of a confidential settlement, and either party was permitted to apply to restore the case for a further hearing in default. The order stated that if no such application was received by 4pm on Tuesday 17 December 2019, the claims would stand dismissed. The judgment records no substantive liability findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a consent order adjourning the hearing to allow agreed confidential settlement terms to be implemented. It does not identify or determine any substantive claim, and it states only that the claims would stand dismissed if no restoration application was made by 4pm on Tuesday 17 December 2019. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.